Comments on: Response to FriendlyAtheist Post: “Revelation” http://glork.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/response-to-friendlyatheist-post-revelation/ random ruminations of a physics student Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:26:56 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: glork http://glork.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/response-to-friendlyatheist-post-revelation/#comment-895 glork Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:05:36 +0000 http://glork.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/response-to-friendlyatheist-post-revelation/#comment-895 Hmm... I have to say I am disappointed with the type of comments I get on this blog sometimes. Monnig's comment is definitely a reason for this. 1. If you want to sound intelligent, use proper punctuation and line breaks. Spelling helps too. 2. Your argument is neither sufficiently explained, nor is it coherent. What is Revelation? Are you referring to the events in the book of Revelations? Obviously, that event hasn't occurred yet. What do you mean? 3. You are apparently paranoid in some way. I'm not sure if I can even have a rational conversation with someone who thinks "Yahweh may still be angry about" the fact that there aren't any heavens on the earth. I'm not even sure what you meant about truth having a reason to go beyond itself. I'm tempted to just plain delete such comments, since they don't really contribute to conversation in a significant, constructive way. If you respond in a second comment that is more coherent, I will leave it. Otherwise, I'm deleting the comment above this one the next time I run across it while maintaining my blog. Hmm… I have to say I am disappointed with the type of comments I get on this blog sometimes. Monnig’s comment is definitely a reason for this.

1. If you want to sound intelligent, use proper punctuation and line breaks. Spelling helps too.
2. Your argument is neither sufficiently explained, nor is it coherent. What is Revelation? Are you referring to the events in the book of Revelations? Obviously, that event hasn’t occurred yet. What do you mean?
3. You are apparently paranoid in some way. I’m not sure if I can even have a rational conversation with someone who thinks “Yahweh may still be angry about” the fact that there aren’t any heavens on the earth. I’m not even sure what you meant about truth having a reason to go beyond itself.

I’m tempted to just plain delete such comments, since they don’t really contribute to conversation in a significant, constructive way. If you respond in a second comment that is more coherent, I will leave it. Otherwise, I’m deleting the comment above this one the next time I run across it while maintaining my blog.

]]> By: David Monnig http://glork.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/response-to-friendlyatheist-post-revelation/#comment-894 David Monnig Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:05:22 +0000 http://glork.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/response-to-friendlyatheist-post-revelation/#comment-894 If you read the scriptures carefully you will see iin Matthew 24-34 that Revelation has already happened. And this shouldnt surpise us, the question what do we do then leaves us one option that Messiyah comes back every millinium to bring judgement anyway. Hes at the new heavens and earth now and as you can tell there arent any heavens to this ole earth. But beware on spreading the word. Yahweh may still be angry about that. so why am I writing this to you? Because truth has a reason to go beyond itself and explanation threre can be realizing more important things. If you read the scriptures carefully you will see iin Matthew 24-34 that Revelation has already happened.
And this shouldnt surpise us, the question what do we do then leaves us one option that Messiyah comes back every millinium to bring judgement anyway. Hes at the new heavens and earth now and as you can tell there arent any heavens to this ole earth. But beware on spreading the word. Yahweh may still be angry about that. so why am I writing this
to you? Because truth has a reason
to go beyond itself and explanation threre can be realizing more important things.

]]>